39,980 / Engraved No. 8 / Henry P. Sinclaire / 21 Jan 1909 / 4 May 1909
40,196 / Assyrian / Henry P. Sinclaire / 3 Jun 1909 / 3 Aug 1909
40,603 / Flutes & Panel Border / Henry P. Sinclaire / 4 Feb 1910 / 5 Apr 1910
41,204 / Snow Flakes & Holly / Henry P. Sinclaire / 30 Dec 1910 / 28 Feb 1911
44,774 / Diamonds & Silver Threads / Henry P. Sinclaire / 16 Aug 1913 / 21 Oct 1913 (*) (note 1)
47,411 / Adam / Henry P. Sinclaire / 23 Feb 1915 / 1 Jun 1915 (*) (note 2)
47,412 / Georgian / Henry P. Sinclaire / 23 Feb 1915 / 1 Jun 1915 (*)
48,765 / (shape only: salad-dressing bottle) / Henry P. Sinclaire / 27 Jan 1916 / 21 Mar 1916
49,479 / Stratford / Henry P. Sinclaire / 27 Mar 1916 / 1 Aug 1916 (*)
The last five patents, above, are not included in Revi (1965). Their images can be found in the correction file for Revi's book (the revi1.htm file in Part 1).
NOTES:
1. This pattern, when realized, usually varies from the patented design -- for example, the silver threads are parallel, not divergent, and a band of short flutes is sometimes added. Spillman (1996, p. 290) incorrectly calls the pattern "Silver Diamonds and Silver Threads". Elsewhere, the Sinclaire photo-inventory refers to these diamonds as "strawberry diamonds", the name that is given (correctly) to the cross-cut diamond motif when it is used, in whole or in part, as the name of a pattern. Silver diamonds, on the other had, refers to the strawberry (or fine) diamond motif when this cutting is used, again in whole or in part, as a pattern name, principally by C. Dorflinger & Sons. It is a propriatory name and, therefore, should not be used as a synonym for strawberry (fine) diamonds. In any case the "silver-diamond" motif does not appear in this patented design.
2. Sinclaire (1974, p. 38) indicates that Adam No. 2 was patented. However, a search of the patent indicies for 1915 and 1916, kindly undertaken for the writer by the Reference Department of the Erie County Library System, has failed to find any patents for these years other than those listed in this table. Sinclaire made a mistake.
Updated 17 Jul 2005